Monday, April 11, 2011

Vaccination Cult Attempting to Censor the National Vaccine Information Center



It's come to my attention that the the link on the site encouraging the censorship of the NVIC was incorrect (info@cbsoutdoors.com.). There is no S at the end of outdoor. If you've sent an email I suggest you resend it to 

info@cbsoutdoor.com.



A group of die-hard vaccine fanatics are currently massing their resources to shut down an ad being run on the CBS JumboTron on Times Square by the National Vaccine Information Center and Dr. Joseph Mercola. We must respond

The ad encourages parents to know their rights when it comes to vaccination. Any information contrary to the controlled message of the Machine is seen as a huge threat to the establishment. Therefore, vaccine pushers and their supporters are they’re getting all their little scientist and wanna be scientist friends involved in a campaign and petition to silence the NVIC and any other voices not towing the vaccine party line. We’ve got to fight back! Let CBS know that censorship is unacceptable and that parents have the right to hear the other side of the story when it comes to vaccination. Please contact CBS outdoors - the group in owning the JumboTron - and repost this and encourage your contacts to tell CBS outdoors that censorship at the behest of the vaccine vested interests is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Contact information below.

Vaccine fan boy and blogger "Orac" seems to be spearheading the campaign. Details here:

This is where we need to respond with emails

info@cbsoutdoor.com

Finally this links to the vaccine cult's little censorship petition

Here's my response sent in an email to CBS:

Censorship campaign targeting CBS outdoors:


It's come to my attention that a number of internet groups with an unusual affection for vaccines are massing in an attempt to encourage your company to engage in a act of censorship by taking down an innocuous ad by the National Vaccine Information Center appearing on the CBS JumboTron on Times Square. The ad simply asks parents to learn about vaccines and become aware or their rights as it pertains to those medical treatments. The campaign represents an intolerance to any thought straying from the formulated message that no choices involving vaccination can be tolerated. I hope you'll see this fringe group of vaccine extremists for what they are and reject these absurd, unwarranted and anti-American attempts at censorship



31 comments:

  1. ...a number of internet groups with an unusual affection for public health...

    Fixed it for ya!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Ren and ANB

    Why don't you guys (and chicks) just hold your breath until CBS relents

    ReplyDelete
  4. i do not know why they feel so threatened by those ads. all they are doing is informing the public that they need to look into vaccines and make an INFORMED decision about them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Michele, as I've said elsewhere their paranoia regarding an innocuous ad simply asking parents to become aware of vaccines and their rights in regards to those vaccines reveals what a decrepit house of cards the vaccine program really is

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just watched the add, I must admit I find it quite amusing that these Skep groups are getting all hot and bothered over nothing!!! Did the ad lie? No. Yes there are risks, and YES parents have a choice in the matter. It is a choice that parents need to know they have a right to make.

    Thanks for posting Robert.

    B. St. Marie

    ReplyDelete
  7. Proof that vaccines did not save us: See all Graphs

    http://genesgreenbook.com/content/proof-vaccines-didnt-save-us

    By genebean - Posted on 07 November 2009

    History shows us that vaccines did NOT eradicate the diseases that plagued humanity. That is a common misconception -- in actual fact, it was better sanitation and hygiene in the cities that prevented the spread of diseases. These charts, from official sources, show us that vaccines (1) were not responsible, and are not necessary, for eliminating infectious diseases, (2) are not effective, and (3) are dangerous.

    These charts are part of a document prepared by Raymond Obomsawin, PhD. You can access this document here in PDF format. The data comes from various sources including national public health agencies, encyclopedias, Vital Statistics and Historical Statistics of the US, published medical journals

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. V N C I(Vaccines Never Cause Injury)?

    Get it right!:

    N V I C. org
    (National Vaccine Information Center)

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I wrote CBS in support of NVIC.

    My oldest child was vaccine injured in 1988 and still suffers from that adverse reaction 22+yrs later.

    Despite my personal experience, I have never once told anyone to "not" vaccinate their child. However, much like NVIC, I do promote EDUCATION on the subject. I encourage people to review the ingredients list on the CDC's very own web site and to know their rights under the law.

    NVIC is not telling people to "not" vaccinate. All they're doing is promoting education of the facts that there are risks and benefits to choices made and making people aware of the laws supporting those choices in each state of our Union. They are giving parents an opportunity to know them all (risks) and not just what the Government and big Pharma want the general masses to know.

    NVIC also helps a parent of a vaccine injured child to work through the proper steps to report an adverse reaction. There are many, many doctors out there who won't do this like they're supposed to. As a result, the percentages of adverse reactions are grossly understated.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Polly, I'm sorry to hear that. It's sad that there's an extremist element that would deny parents the right to even think about whether or not to vaccinate. That's why the vaccine pushers hate the internet so much. There, and through the NVIC, they might learn that "No shots, no school" and other vaccine myths are simply not true

    ReplyDelete
  13. "Censorship is the suppression of speech or other communication which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or inconvenient to the general body of people as determined by a government, media outlet, or other controlling body."

    @Ren, What do YOU think Censorship means?

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @Ren
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/cultureshock/whodecides/definitions.html

    Censorship is a word of many meanings. In its broadest sense it refers to suppression of information, ideas, or artistic expression by anyone, whether government officials, church authorities, private pressure groups, or speakers, writers, and artists themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I'm sorry Ren, but what your petition is asking for IS Censorship!
    Sad day to be an American with people like you. Thinking censorship is OK :(

    ReplyDelete
  18. Vaccines aside. People have the right to be informed so they can make a CHOICE... America is FREEDOM OF CHOICE! It is not me who decides what my neighbor chooses, nor you. THAT IS FREEDOM!
    CENSORSHIP is BAD, not good. YOU are being ANTI-AMERICAN with your petition and that is a FACT!!!

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I am an AMERICAN! Doesn't matter where I live. Nor what I choose. That is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS:
    My FREEDOMS being taken away IS MY BUSINESS!
    CENSORSHIP IS MY BUSINESS, AS AN AMERICAN!!!
    PRO vaccines, ANTI vaccine.. IT DOESN'T MATTER!!!

    You are advocating CENSORSHIP here no matter how you try to rationalize it.
    I saw the add, all it really is asking if for people to educate themselves.
    EDUCATION IS NOT bad!
    CENSORSHIP.. is BAD!!!

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Ren, you are so missing the point.
    They have not voiced anything but to educate.

    I am against YOU. YOU are advocating CENSORSHIP!
    FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Have you ever heard of that?

    Your stance here is ANTI-AMERICAN! I have a problem with THAT!

    ReplyDelete
  23. @Ren

    Of course you would. Forced vaccination is at the heart of the current "public health" regime under which we live. And the CDC and WHO? Why should I look to their guidance when they're in the business of vaccinating every man, woman and child on the planet? Why don't we just let those favoring vaccines engage in a pubic debate with those who have questions and then let parents decide

    ReplyDelete
  24. @Cyn

    To them, freedom is just an obstacle to their vaccination agenda

    ReplyDelete
  25. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Ren tends to come off here as an idiot with an anti-choice/anti-freedom agenda. Cyn makes a very good argument. Thanks to Robert for sharing logical and fair thoughts throughout this comment thread. It is refreshing to see people openly pushing for honesty and freedom rather than mass ignorance and suppression of free will.

    It's hard feeling like you're in the minority on important issues, especially when those with the money are hitting every angle to ensure silence and misinformation on those issues. The only reason pro-vaccination people seem to make up the majority in this debate is that honest information about vaccines is widely suppressed and fear tactics are commonly used against people with little knowledge on the subject. If the true history, statistics, study results, and information involving ingredients and their possible side effects were allowed to freely pass before the eyes of the public, vaccines would quickly be a thing of the past - just some once commonly utilized pseudoscience technique that led to countless needless deaths and injuries. Medical schools would then be forced to report on the history of vaccines in the same way as they would the once common practice of cutting out disease by allowing the bad blood to flow out from the body or any other number of past bad medical practices. Pharmaceutical companies would have to depend on their lists of other bad medicines to get rich off of and come up with new ways to ensure the sickness of society so that their other products could receive some monetary attention. And the government would just have to find something else to tax on such a wide assured scale. etc. etc.

    ReplyDelete
  27. René!!

    Keep your head down. At Gorski's place I've found being so badly outnumbered a little daunting. I appreciate your pointing me to this site and certainly support your right to comment here without the ad hominem attacks I'm subject to at RI. If the facts truly support the current vaccine schedule, the billboard can merely be contradicted in the light of day without any thought at all to having it removed.

    Best,

    Jay

    ReplyDelete
  28. I find it odd that the 'skep'tic agenda does not include skepticism against say... big government institutions, the way in which medical research is conducted or funded, proof that vaccines are safe and effective, etc... Only against people who do not fit the orthodox views of a supposed scientific consensus (which doesn't really exist in the same way a mothering consensus was never reached). Well, you know, there was a time when the orthodox view was religious and anti-scientific.

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Lisa

    Like any vested interest, those living of the vaccine program will not go quietly. Just look at what's happened this past year: fear mongering around the measles and whooping cough being used to both preserve and extend the Machine's power over parents.

    ReplyDelete
  30. My email to CBS....
    I just wanted my feelings to be known on an issue that I have recently become aware of. I have learned that there is an organization trying to shut down the ads by the National Vaccine Information Center and Dr. Joseph Mercola. This thought absolutely horrifies me! I fully support National Vaccine Information Center and Dr. Joseph Mercola and their efforts to encourage parents and consumers to make more informed decisions. Anything other than this is wrong and trying to stop National Vaccine Information Center and Dr. Joseph Mercola is unacceptable/unfair censorship. I would like to believe that your establishment supports free speech and informed choice. If I think anything other than that I will be making sure to boycott CBS and let my friends and colleagues know why I am. Please offer your reassurance that you will not let this happen? No one is being irresponsible here. The message is clear. BE INFORMED. Make informed decisions rather than just doing/believing what you are told- do research, look at facts not opinions. This is a GOOD thing. Please don't stop it.

    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete